<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Smarter Giving Guy &#187; skunks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartergivingguy.com/tag/skunks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartergivingguy.com</link>
	<description>Helping Philanthropists Do Good Better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon AG Challenges Charity Skunks</title>
		<link>http://smartergivingguy.com/2011/04/oregon-ag-challenges-charity-skunks/</link>
		<comments>http://smartergivingguy.com/2011/04/oregon-ag-challenges-charity-skunks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SG Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skunks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telemarketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartergivingguy.com/?p=2128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Oregon Attorney General is challenging the operations of “charities” that seek donations in Oregon but spend little on their missions. A report in The Oregonian focuses on the activities of Shiloh International Ministries, which led the AG’s list of “20 Worst Charities” for 2010. Shiloh International Ministries is based in La Verne, California; its EIN [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Oregon Attorney General is challenging the operations of “charities” that seek donations in Oregon but spend little on their missions. A report in <em>The Oregonian</em> focuses on the activities of Shiloh International Ministries, which led the AG’s list of “20 Worst Charities” for 2010. Shiloh International Ministries is based in La Verne, California; its EIN is 953572055.</p>
<p><a href="http://seriousgivers.org/2011/03/oregon-ag-challenges-charity-skunks/" target="_blank">Find more information about Shiloh International Ministries, the 20 Worst Charities list and the AG&#8217;s proposal for legislation to clamp down on &#8220;charities&#8221; that don&#8217;t focus on their missions.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartergivingguy.com/2011/04/oregon-ag-challenges-charity-skunks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fascinating charity telemarketer thinking</title>
		<link>http://smartergivingguy.com/2010/09/fascinating-charity-telemarketer-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://smartergivingguy.com/2010/09/fascinating-charity-telemarketer-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SG Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skunks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telemarketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartergivingguy.com/?p=1999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported last Sunday on the work of Jason Birrittier &#8212; charity telemarketing entrepreneur. Jason recently shut down his telemarketing operation (called Public Safety), after a run-in with law enforcement. He denied all allegations.</p> <p>Based in St. Louis, and with contracts with Disabled Firefighters Fund, the Coalition of Police and Sheriffs, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2012" title="Fascinating Thinking" src="http://smartergivingguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/FascinatingThinking-200x200.jpg" alt="Fascinating Thinking" width="200" height="200" />The <em>St. Louis Post-Dispatch</em> reported last Sunday on the work of Jason Birrittier &#8212; charity telemarketing entrepreneur. Jason recently shut down his telemarketing operation (called Public Safety), after a run-in with law enforcement. He denied all allegations.</p>
<p>Based in St. Louis, and with contracts with Disabled Firefighters Fund, the Coalition of Police and Sheriffs, and the American Veterans Relief Foundation, Public Safety kept more than 80 percent of the money it raised. <em>Note: </em>each of those three &#8220;badge&#8221; organizations <a href="http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/veterans-police-firefighters-sham-nonprofits/" target="_self">had previously earned our Charity Skunk award</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_f117b959-f8c1-5fca-9307-3a129d9fbb34.html" target="_blank">Read the <em>St. Louis Post-Dispatch</em> story.</a></p>
<p>Comments in the article from Mr. Birrittier provide fascinating insight into his thinking (and perhaps that of similar charity telemarketers). According to the <em>Post-Dispatch</em>:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;I felt by what I was doing, I was still helping out,&#8221; Birrittier said.</li>
<li>Birrittier said he enjoyed talking to donors. If any of them asked how much of their donation would stay with Public Safety, he said, he would offer the truth — 82 or 85 percent, depending on the charity.  &#8220;People would still give after telling them that,&#8221; he said, &#8220;believe it or not.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Apparently his thinking was &#8212; &#8220;If people are willing to donate when more than 80% won&#8217;t go to the charity, why shouldn&#8217;t I give them the opportunity?&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Mr. Birrittier reminds us why we <a href="http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/im-avoiding-charities-that-use-paid-telemarketers/" target="_self">avoid charities that use paid telemarketers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartergivingguy.com/2010/09/fascinating-charity-telemarketer-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Charity&#8221; telemarketer hit with $18.8 million fine</title>
		<link>http://smartergivingguy.com/2010/08/charity-telemarketer-hit-with-18-8-million-fine/</link>
		<comments>http://smartergivingguy.com/2010/08/charity-telemarketer-hit-with-18-8-million-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SG Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skunks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telemarketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartergivingguy.com/?p=1942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;charity&#8221; telemarketing company Civic Development Group has been ordered by the Federal Trade Commission to pay an $18.8 million fine, the largest penalty ever handed down in a consumer protection case &#8212; as detailed in the American Institute of Philanthropy&#8217;s latest Report. CDG and its owners have now earned our not-so-coveted Charity Skunk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-286" title="skunk" src="http://smartergivingguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/skunk.gif" alt="Skunk" width="119" height="116" />The &#8220;charity&#8221; telemarketing company <strong>Civic Development Group</strong> has been ordered by the Federal Trade Commission to pay an $18.8 million fine, the largest penalty ever handed down in a consumer protection case &#8212; as detailed in the American Institute of Philanthropy&#8217;s latest Report. CDG and its owners have now earned our not-so-coveted <a href="http://smartergivingguy.com/charity-skunk-awards/" target="_self"><strong>Charity Skunk Award</strong></a>.</p>
<p>According to the AIP report, CDG telemarketers lied to potential donors about the portion of moneys that would go to charity, and typically turned over not more than 15% of the moneys raised to charity. CDG fundraised for numerous local firefighter, police and veterans charities and also had contracts with several groups that received &#8220;F&#8221; ratings from AIP. <a href="http://www.charitywatch.org/articles/Fundraisers_Banned.html" target="_blank">Read the AIP article</a>. <span id="more-1942"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/im-avoiding-charities-that-use-paid-telemarketers/" target="_self">Read our May 2009 article</a> &#8211; where  we commented &#8220;The connection between sleazy &#8216;charities&#8217; and paid telemarketing can’t be denied — they frequently travel together&#8221; and we encouraged donors to join us in adopting a &#8220;rebuttable presumption” approach against donating to charities that use paid telemarketers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartergivingguy.com/2010/08/charity-telemarketer-hit-with-18-8-million-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Car donation charity a clunker, charges Cuomo</title>
		<link>http://smartergivingguy.com/2010/06/car-donation-charity-a-clunker-charges-cuomo/</link>
		<comments>http://smartergivingguy.com/2010/06/car-donation-charity-a-clunker-charges-cuomo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SG Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skunks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartergivingguy.com/?p=1895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The New York Daily News reports that Andrew Cuomo, NY&#8217;s attorney general, has sued a local &#8220;charity&#8221; called Feed the Hungry over the handling of its car donation program. The suit alleges that less than 2% of the proceeds of the donation program went to helping the homeless. The suit is part of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1896" title="clunker" src="http://smartergivingguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/clunker-200x129.jpg" alt="Clunker" width="200" height="129" />The New York Daily News reports that Andrew Cuomo, NY&#8217;s attorney general, has sued a local &#8220;charity&#8221; called Feed the Hungry over the handling of its car donation program. The suit alleges that less than 2% of the proceeds of the donation program went to helping the homeless. The suit is part of a wider probe of vehicle-donation charities.</p>
<p>While there are undoubtedly charities that operate reputable vehicle-donation programs as part of their fundraising work &#8211; in our view vehicle-donation programs in general are suspect. Cuomo&#8217;s message: &#8220;be cautious and do some research.&#8221; We agree.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2010/06/15/2010-06-15_ag_andrew_cuomo_car_charities_kars_4_kids_lechaim_for_life_cars_that_help_taking.html" target="_blank" class="broken_link">Read the NY Daily News story</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartergivingguy.com/2010/06/car-donation-charity-a-clunker-charges-cuomo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disabled Veterans &#8220;Charity&#8221; Scam Hits Minnesota</title>
		<link>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/08/disabled-veterans-charity-scam-hits-minnesota/</link>
		<comments>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/08/disabled-veterans-charity-scam-hits-minnesota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SG Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skunks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartergivingguy.com/?p=1107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We here in California are not alone dealing with the sleazy folks who dress themselves up as charities and dial for dollars for causes including veterans, firefighters, police and more. Another one of these groups has now hit Minnesota, according to a story in the Minneapolis &#8211; St. Paul StarTribune.</p> <p>See our post in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We here in California are not alone dealing with the sleazy folks who dress themselves up as charities and dial for dollars for causes including veterans, firefighters, police and more. Another one of these groups has now hit Minnesota, according to a <a href="http://www.startribune.com/local/east/53262422.html?page=1&amp;c=y" target="_blank">story in the Minneapolis &#8211; St. Paul</a> StarTribune.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/more-skunks-surface-in-charity-telemarketing-probe/" target="_blank">our post</a> in May on the California’s Attorney General&#8217;s Office lawsuits against 53 individuals, 17 telemarketers and 12 “charities” who purported to be helping police, firefighters and veterans. <span id="more-1107"></span>The California action is part of the Federal Trade Commission’s <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.ftc.gov');" href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/05/charityfraud.shtm" target="_blank">Operation False Charity</a>.</p>
<p>The Minnesota group &#8211; calling itself Minnesota Disabled Veterans &#8211; isn&#8217;t a charity and accordingly doesn&#8217;t show up on <a href="http://www.irs.gov/app/pub-78/" target="_blank">IRS Publication 78&#8242;s list of charities</a>. But the group uses a name confusingly similar to that of a known charity: Disabled American Veterans of Minnesota.</p>
<p>The Minnesota group raises its money through <a href="http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/im-avoiding-charities-that-use-paid-telemarketers/" target="_blank">telemarketing</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/08/disabled-veterans-charity-scam-hits-minnesota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Skunks Surface in Charity / Telemarketing Probe</title>
		<link>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/more-skunks-surface-in-charity-telemarketing-probe/</link>
		<comments>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/more-skunks-surface-in-charity-telemarketing-probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SG Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skunks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telemarketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartergivingguy.com/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>California&#8217;s Office of the Attorney General on May 29 announced lawsuits against 53 individuals, 17 telemarketers and 12 &#8220;charities&#8221; who purported to be helping police, firefighters and veterans. The California action is part of the Federal Trade Commission&#8217;s Operation False Charity.</p> <p>Based on the California action, each of the following has earned our Charity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California&#8217;s Office of the Attorney General on May 29 <a href="http://ag.ca.gov/newsalerts/release.php?id=1746" target="_blank">announced</a> lawsuits against 53 individuals, 17 telemarketers and 12 &#8220;charities&#8221; who purported to be helping police, firefighters and veterans. The California action is part of the Federal Trade Commission&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/05/charityfraud.shtm" target="_blank">Operation False Charity</a>.</p>
<p>Based on the California action, each of the following has earned our Charity Skunk Award:</p>
<ul>
<li>Law Enforcement Apprenticeship Program, and its directors and fundraiser (Rembret, Inc.)</li>
<li>California Police Youth Charities, and its executive director and fundraisers (National Consultants, Inc. and Public Appeals, Inc.)<span id="more-724"></span></li>
<li>American Association of Police Officers, Police Protective Fund, Inc. and Junior Police Academy (operated by the same group), their officers and fundraisers (including West Coast Advertising, aka Professional Communications Network, and Mark Christiansen, dba Charitable Fundraising Services).</li>
<li>Association for Firefighters and Paramedics, its president and its fundraisers (Public Awareness LLC, Community Support, Inc. and Courtesy Call, Inc.)</li>
<li>Association for Police and Sheriffs, Inc., its directors and fundraisers (Public Awareness LLC, and Courtesy Call, Inc.)</li>
<li>Homeless and Disabled Veterans Corporation and its fundraiser (Almost, Inc.)</li>
</ul>
<p>California also acted against Coalition of Police and Sheriffs, Disabled Firefighters Fund and American Veterans Relief Foundation &#8212; <a href="http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/veterans-police-firefighters-sham-nonprofits/" target="_blank">earlier recipients of Charity Skunk Awards</a>.</p>
<p>The complaints overflow with allegations like: fraud, false promises, misuse of donated funds, unfair business prectices, filing false public documents, failure to keep records, deceptive and misleading solicitations, improperly compensating directors and officers, and deceptive and abusive telemarketing practices.</p>
<p>Tips offered to potential donors by the California Attorney General&#8217;s Office:</p>
<ul>
<li>If you receive an unsolicited call asking for a donation, it is most likely from a paid telemarketer who may keep a substantial part of your donation as payment of fundraising fees.</li>
<li>Recognize that the words &#8216;veterans&#8217; or &#8216;military families&#8217; in an organization&#8217;s name don&#8217;t necessarily mean that veterans or the families of active-duty personnel will benefit from your donation.</li>
<li>Donate to charities with a track record and a history. Charities that spring up overnight may disappear just as quickly.</li>
<li>If you have any doubt about whether you have made a pledge or a contribution, check your records. If you don&#8217;t remember making the donation or pledge, resist the pressure to give.</li>
<li>Check out an organization before donating. Some phony charities use names, seals and logos that look or sound like those of respected, well-established organizations.</li>
<li>Ask the soliciting charity or the paid fundraiser what percentage of your donation will go towards fundraising expenses and what percentage will go towards the charity&#8217;s charitable purpose.</li>
<li>Do not send or give cash donations. For security and tax record purposes, it is best to pay by check made payable to the charity.</li>
<li>Ask for a receipt showing the amount of your contribution.</li>
<li>Be wary of promises of guaranteed sweepstakes winnings in exchange for a contribution. You never have to give a donation to be eligible to win a sweepstakes.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/more-skunks-surface-in-charity-telemarketing-probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charity Skunk Awards: Veterans, Police and Firefighter Sham Nonprofits</title>
		<link>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/veterans-police-firefighters-sham-nonprofits/</link>
		<comments>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/veterans-police-firefighters-sham-nonprofits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SG Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skunks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telemarketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartergivingguy.com/?p=655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced on May 20 Federal court cases and proposed settlement orders involving</p> American Veterans Relief Fund (AVRF), Coalition of Police and Sheriffs, Inc. (COPS), Disabled Firefighters Fund (DFF) and Individual defendants Jeffrey Dean Duncan, William Rose and Kathy Clinkenbeard, <p>alleging that all three organizations, based at the same address [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/05/charityfraud.shtm" target="_blank">announced</a> on May 20 Federal court cases and proposed settlement orders involving<img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-286" title="skunk" src="http://smartergivingguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/skunk-150x150.gif" alt="skunk" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<ul>
<li>American Veterans Relief Fund (AVRF),</li>
<li>Coalition of Police and Sheriffs, Inc. (COPS),</li>
<li>Disabled Firefighters Fund (DFF) and</li>
<li>Individual defendants Jeffrey Dean Duncan, William Rose and Kathy Clinkenbeard,</li>
</ul>
<p>alleging that all three organizations, based at the same address in Santa Ana, CA, were created almost entirely to provide profits for the individual defendants and the for-profit fundraisers they hire. In recognition of their work, we&#8217;ve awarded the organizations and individual defendants our not-so-coveted <a href="http://smartergivingguy.com/charity-skunk-awards/" target="_blank">Charity Skunk Award</a>.<span id="more-655"></span></p>
<p>The FTC alleges, for example, that telemarketers calling on behalf of AVRF falsely claimed that the money they were raising would support families of soldiers fighting overseas &#8212; when virtually no money went to such families; COPS misrepresented its affiliation with law enforcement; and each organization misrepresented that donations would go to a legitimate charity, that they had programs (which did not exist), and that the programs would benefit the local community of the donor.</p>
<p>According to a related <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-charity-scam21-2009may21,0,5529225.story" target="_blank"><em>Los Angeles Times</em> report</a>, the groups raised $19 million from 2005 to 2008 but turned over only 5% of the money to legitimate charities. The report quotes counsel to the defendants, who said &#8220;the groups didn&#8217;t pay more to charities because they [the groups] incurred high costs.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more interesting information to be gleaned from the most recent tax returns (Form 990) of the three organizations,</p>
<ul>
<li>In 2007, together they raised more than $4 million. In 2004 through 2007, together they raised more than $18 million.</li>
<li>In 2007, together they averaged spending a miniscule 5.3% on programs (the leader being AVRF, which spent a whopping 7.3%).</li>
<li>In 2007, 65% of their spending went to ten <strong>outside telemarketing firms </strong>&#8211; and one firm was common to all three organizations.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you take a look at the filings by that common firm with the CA Registry of Charitable Trusts, you&#8217;ll see that:</p>
<ul>
<li>The firm reported that they raised a bit over $2 million for charities, and that only about $300,000 (or 14.5%) of that went to charities. Guess that&#8217;s some of what counsel (see above) was talking about.</li>
<li>COPS, DFF and AVRF aren&#8217;t the only groups the firm has worked for here in California.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Kind of makes us wonder whether the FTC has found a whole den of skunks &#8212; we hope they&#8217;ll keep digging, regardless of the smell!</strong></p>
<p>The FTC website has several helpful documents on avoiding charity fraud. <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/charityfraud/" target="_blank">Start with this one.</a> See also our links in the right column.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/05/veterans-police-firefighters-sham-nonprofits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charity Skunk Award: National Foundation of America</title>
		<link>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/03/charity-skunk-award-national-foundation-of-america/</link>
		<comments>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/03/charity-skunk-award-national-foundation-of-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SG Guy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skunks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartergivingguy.com/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently I learned of a charitable scam that had been operating in my local area (as well as other parts of the U.S.) &#8211; National Foundation of America (NFOA). In recognition of its work, we&#8217;ve awarded NFOA our not-so-coveted Charity Skunk Award.</p> <p>NFOA and several related individuals are now the subject of desist and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I learned of a charitable scam that had been operating in my local area (as well as other parts of the U.S.) &#8211; National Foundation of America (NFOA). In recognition of its work, we&#8217;ve awarded NFOA our not-so-coveted <a href="http://smartergivingguy.com/charity-skunk-awards/" target="_blank">Charity Skunk Award</a>.<img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-286" title="skunk" src="http://smartergivingguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/skunk-150x150.gif" alt="skunk" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>NFOA and several related individuals are now the subject of desist and refrain orders issued by the California Department of Corporations. The orders are <a href="http://www.corp.ca.gov/ENF/list/n/nfoa.asp" target="_blank">available online</a>.</p>
<p>The orders reveal that NFOA, among other things,</p>
<ul>
<li>Held itself out as a charitable, humanitarian and philanthropic organization &#8212; when it was not.</li>
<li>Offered to individuals &#8220;tax-deductible charitable strategies&#8221; &#8212; which were neither tax-deductible nor charitable.</li>
<li>Targeted elderly and unsophisticated investors, and collected more than $3 million from its targets.</li>
<li>Failed to register with the California Registry of Charitable Trusts, even though it did business in California as a charity.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartergivingguy.com/2009/03/charity-skunk-award-national-foundation-of-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charity Skunks</title>
		<link>http://smartergivingguy.com/charity-skunk-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://smartergivingguy.com/charity-skunk-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skunks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartergivingguy.com/?page_id=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. is a very charitable and generous society. Unfortunately, the charitable, generous natures of many makes them the target of the unscrupulous &#8212; who often disguise themselves to look like charitable or humanitarian causes.</p> <p>These schemers will always be with us. Building on their everyday activities, they seem to be especially active following [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. is a very charitable and generous society. Unfortunately, the charitable, generous natures of many makes them the target of the unscrupulous &#8212; who often disguise themselves to look like charitable or humanitarian causes.</p>
<p>These schemers will always be with us. Building on their everyday activities, they seem to be especially active following up on well-publicized disasters across the world.<img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-286" title="skunk" src="http://smartergivingguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/skunk-150x150.gif" alt="skunk" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve created the <strong>Charity Skunk Awards</strong> to help spread the warning about charity scammers and their schemes. We can learn by observing what they&#8217;ve done. We can spread awareness. Perhaps we can even help law enforcement catch a few while we&#8217;re at it. <a href="http://smartergivingguy.com/tag/skunks/" target="_blank">Past Charity Skunk Award recipients</a>.</p>
<p><strong>You can help in this effort. </strong>If you have come across a charity scammer, give us the details in an email you send to skunks@smartergivingguy.com &#8212; we&#8217;ll check out the information you give us and, who knows, you might nominate the Charity Skunk of the Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartergivingguy.com/charity-skunk-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

